Education Reform: Can Technology Replace Teachers?
Quality debated as districts tap tech over teachers
By Ian Quillen, Published Online: August 7, 2012
Published in Print: August 8, 2012, as When Technology Tools Trump Teachers
Premium article access courtesy of Edweek.org.
Read more FREE content!
Of all the recent budget cuts made by the Eagle County, Colo., school district—the loss of 89 staff jobs through attrition and layoffs, a 1.5 percent across-the-board pay cut, and the introduction of three furlough days—none sparked as much anger or faced the same scrutiny as the decision to cut three foreign-language teaching positions and replace them with online instruction.
At a spring school board meeting, supporters of the targeted programs in French and German, as well as the affected teachers, railed against the 6,200-student district for replacing face-to-face instructors with a digital option they argued would not be as rich or as meaningful.
The highly charged response reflects the fear many teachers are beginning to feel that technology could push them out of their jobs, especially in an era of persistently tight budgets.
TomMcDonald’s Comments:
The goal is effective and efficient, long term, individual student learning, of critical must know information.
Where individual long term, learning, = Instructor Facilitated, Appropriate: initial understanding, ongoing reinforcement, fluency/mastery, recall (eliminating forgetting), application, stick/behavior change, in the most effective and most efficient way possible
Brain based, research proven, classroom proven learning methodologies solidly point towards a new long term learning model:
(1) Instructor facilitated, truly personalized, learning methodology, over time, (2) with instructor facilitated, truly personalized, reinforcement, over time, (3) in an instructor facilitated, truly personalized blended learning environment, over time
Ask any teacher and they agree that the ideal model is one teacher to one student.
If teacher facilitated, truly personalized learning technology, in a blended learning environment, is the most effective and most efficient way to empower each student with long term, truly personalized learning, shouldn’t everyone involved think it’s a great idea?
Is this not consistent with organization objectives, proven learning research and optimized student learning outcomes?
Great teachers will be bettered with appropriate, truly personalized learning technology and will empower students with advanced, long term learning outcomes.
Poor teachers will need to become better or be repositioned, consistent with defined, organization/student strategic objectives.
Resisting teacher facilitated, research proven, classroom proven, advanced, individual long term learning outcomes, supplemented by proven learning technology, is inconsistent with organization/employer outcomes and does not advance individual student learning outcomes.
Is there a another, affordable, effective and efficient research proven, classroom proven, option to advance individual student learning outcomes?
I’d be interested in knowing (with supporting research validation)
Tom
Related Education Reform and Learning Performance Improvement Information:
Strategic Performance Improvement Consulting:
- Oversaw learning measurement-training evaluation strategy for the 18 Department of Defense Intelligence (DoD) Colleges
- Guided Booz Allen’s Learning & Development (L&D) leadership in developing solutions for improving the delivery of enterprise-wide, self-paced training courses.
- Implemented BOA’s first-ever comprehensive measurement strategy around its learning programs based on business impact, adoption and penetration, critical feedback, and an approach to using benchmarking to compare results.
- Invented and championed Technology Assisted Sampling Tool for Evaluation (TASTE), an innovative tool to enhance productivity
Personalized Learning Technology:
- More Stimulation per Minute of Study
- 300% Improvement in Retained Learning per Hour of Study
- 11% less study time, 22% less test time, and 95% higher test scores
What is an Intelligent Tutoring System?
- More Stimulation per Minute of Study
- 300% Improvement in Retained Learning per Hour of Study
- 11% less study time, 22% less test time, and 95% higher test scores
- Including…How Long does it take to change a Habit?
- Why does Blended Learning Advance Individual Learning and Individual Learning Transfer (Application)?
- What is learning Technology and Why does it Advance Learning in a Teacher Facilitated, Blended Learning Environment?
Two Models for Educational Technology
- One to Many
- One to One
- Which Approach is Research Validated to Advance Individual Learning?
Education and Accelerated Learning:
- What is Accelerated Learning and Why does it work?
- Why is Learning Important?
How to Transfer Training (Learning):
- What does it take to Transfer Learning and why is Learning Transfer Important?
The New Learning Model with Supporting Research Validation:
- More Stimulation per Minute of Study
- 300% Improvement in Retained Learning per Hour of Study
- 11% less study time, 22% less test time, and 95% higher test scores
==================================================================
Learning Optimized, Behavior Changed, Performance Advanced
My deliverables to you are: (I) Improved Learning Outcomes and Increased Competence; a. Retention to fluency (95% vs. 28%), b. Behavior change through accountable reinforcement, c. Improved application, d. Advanced individual performance and e. Advanced organization performance.
You will ensure that every person reaches true mastery* in the shortest amount of time. Mastery* produces people who have the adaptive reasoning skills required to effectively apply knowledge to new situations.
*Mastery is required where appropriate information application is critical to achieve a desired outcome; For example, Education: K-12, Higher, Corporate, Government; Medical; Medical Continuing Medical Education – Performance Improvement; Safety; Sales Performance; Aviation; Military; Individual Certifications and Individual Continuing Education.
McDonald Sales and Marketing, LLC, Specialties:
Appropriate Application; Behavior Change; eLearning; Employee Selection and Employee Development; Human Capital Management; Individual Performance Improvement; Learning Performance Improvement; Learning Retention and Reinforcement Improvement; Organization Performance Improvement; Workforce Development and Productivity; Verbal Skills Simulation and Reinforcement; Sales Performance Improvement; Web-Based (SaaS/Cloud) Solutions
To Discuss how these Solutions will add value for you, your organization and/or your clients, Affinity/Resale Opportunities, and/or Collaborative Efforts, Please Contact:
Tom McDonald, [email protected]; 608-788-5144; Skype: tsmw5752


Tom,
I agree with your comments that a blended approach is best. My focus is mainly corporate training. Over the past decade e-learning and webinar-based instructor led training have been a classic disruptive technologies. They’ve enabled the blended learning which increases learner comprehension while dramatically reducing training costs.
What the article you referenced highlights is that we’re at the tip of the iceberg as to how these disruptive technologies will impact K12 education. While there will always be a place for teachers in K12 education, their role and modus operandi will change dramatically.
Thanks Jeff for your comments
I agree
Tom